Sovereign ratings during crises: is this time different?
Why, despite the increase in public debt levels around the world have sovereign ratings been largely unaffected by the COVID-19 crisis?
Speakers
Alexandra Dimitrijevic
Managing Director, Global Head of Research, S&P Global Ratings
Judith MartÃnez
Head of the cabinet of the Secretary General, Treasury of Spain,
Daniel Vernazza
Chief International Economist, UniCredit,
Video and audio recordings
During the great financial crisis several European sovereigns were abruptly downgraded by private credit rating agencies. Given the importance of these ratings in terms of funding access both from the central bank and from private financial institutions, ratings are considered to have played a pro-cyclical role during that crisis. However, despite the massive use of deficits and the resulting increase in public debt levels around the world to face the COVID-19 crisis, sovereign ratings have, for the moment, largely been unaffected this time. What explains the difference? Is this due to the different nature of the crisis or have regulatory and other changes implemented since the last crisis changed the rating landscape?
Related content
Incorporating political risk into analysis of sovereign debt sustainability
Political risk is not taken into account when assessing whether countries can manage their debts, but it could be and should be
Has Hungarian obstructionism triggered greater EU fiscal integration?
Viktor Orban, by delaying EU aid to Ukraine, may have inadvertently helped make the case for more EU fiscal federalism
Draghi’s message: sharing economic sovereignty is hard but possible
European public goods should be the linchpin of a new political and institutional contract
