�ԹϺ�����

Summary

In his keynote speech, Sergii Marchenko, the Finance Minister of Ukraine highlighted that Ukraine’s pre-war financial situation was good, but the Russian invasion has turned it around. Ukraine has done a fair job of reducing the budget deficit, but help is needed to cover even the most basic expenditures.

Gillian Edgeworth pointed out that Ukraine’s level of macro-financial resilience is remarkable. A huge recession has not prevented the government from functioning well. Ukraine has a current account surplus and its reserves have stabilised. Inflation is around 25% as of August but the National Bank of Ukraine is actively targeting it.

Beatrice Weder di Mauro started her contribution by pointing out that the National Bank of Ukraine has up to now provided most of the funding covering the war deficit. She compares Ukraine to a pressure cooker; it is trying to stabilise its exchange rate while the economy is collapsing, and spending is exploding.

 “What is going on here is that at the same time Ukraine is sending their men to the front and financing it through the inflation tax”.

Beatrice Weder di Mauro

This strategy is not sustainable, and therefore it is essential to provide Ukraine with external funding. Around $38 billion is needed for 2023.

Gert Jan Koopman acknowledged that the effort to support Ukraine has been unsystematic in the past months, but that the coordination is improving. The EU already disbursed 7bn EUR, and there will be more payments until the end of the year. This support is either financed from the EU budget or backed by it. The EU is working on a structured framework for supporting Ukraine in 2023.

Maria Repko pointed out that the National Bank of Ukraine was forced to print money because the grants were not coming, and reserves were disappearing. Budgetary cuts that were introduced included educational, healthcare, and social spending reductions by 25-30%. This is painful for the economy, and the government needs to spend more. We should also remember that the immediate need is to stop the damage to the Ukrainian infrastructure.

In the Q&A session, Jeromin Zettelmeyer asked whether EU financing is constrained by a sense that donors have insufficient control over it. Gert Jan Koopman responded that the EU is taking minimum safeguards even in presence of the war efforts.  Other questions included political risk insurance and policies that can support credit creation in Ukraine.

Notes by Kamil Sekut