Newsletter

What is the future of COPs - repeal or repeat?

Publishing date
25 November 2024
feat image
title

As the second week of COP29 in Baku is ending, the question of whether or not the COP process makes sense has gained momentum once again. The biggest point of contention at this COP concerns climate finance, as representatives from developing countries and the civil society have demanded that the developed countries scale up their effort by 10 times, to a minimum of $1 trillion per year (for a comprehensive overview of the issue see , by Alissa M. Kleinnijenhuis and Patrick Bolton and this one by the same authors and Jeromin Zettelmeyer). 

Despite their flaws, COPs have delivered the Paris Agreement, two global climate funds - the Green Climate Fund and the Loss and Damage Fund - and have brought countries to commit to phase out fossil fuels, end fossil fuel subsidies, operationalize carbon trading globally, and stop deforestation.

In an to all States that are part of the UNFCCC, also to Simon Stiell (Executive Secretary of the UNFCCC) and to António Guterres (UN Secretary General), a high-level group of signatories has suggested a way forward to reform COPs. To enhance credibility they suggest changing the selection process of COP presidencies, introducing strict eligibility criteria based on countries commitment to the UNFCCC climate agenda, and limiting the number of fossil fuel lobbyists participating to COPs, who last year reached the record number of 2,456 (). They also suggest that COPs should shift away from gigantic annual events to smaller thematic meetings, mainly focused on progress reporting, so to streamline and speed up negotiations. They also put forward recommendations to strengthen countries accountability, amplify the voice of science and institute a Climate-Poverty Envoy.

Their plea for reform should be heard and changes swiftly enacted. In a world that is getting more and more fragmented we do not need new fora or exclusive climate clubs, but a stronger multilateral COP framework.

The Why Axis is a weekly newsletter distributed by Bruegel, bringing you the latest research on European economic policy. 

About the authors

  • Giovanni Sgaravatti

    Giovanni worked at Bruegel until December 2024 as an Energy and climate research analyst. He studied Economics (BSc) at University of Venice - Ca’ Foscari - including one semester at the University of Melbourne, and holds a Master’s degree in Quantitative Economics obtained in Venice - having done the whole second year at the Economics School of Louvain.

    Before joining Bruegel Giovanni worked in the Productivity branch of the Office for National Statistics in the United Kingdom. As a trainee he worked at the Delegation of the European Union to Chile and at BusinessEurope. His fields of analysis span from productivity to energy and climate change.

    Giovanni is an Italian native speaker, is fluent in English and has good working knowledge of French and Spanish.

Related content

Dataset

European natural gas imports

This dataset aggregates daily data on European natural gas import flows and storage levels.

Georg Zachmann, Ben McWilliams, UgnÄ— KeliauskaitÄ— and Giovanni Sgaravatti