Newsletter

What are the consequences of the war in Gaza for financial markets?

Publishing date
06 November 2023
Picture of a stack of newspapers
Picture of the title of the 02/11/2023 newsletter

The dramatic recent developments in Israel and Gaza have had limited consequences so far in terms of financial markets trends, outside of Israel itself. Oil prices are down from their level in late September. The war has generated a lot of analysis among market participants, but it has had remarkably little actual market impact.

The reason for this striking contrast is that most market participants appear to view the likelihood of significant escalation as very low. In their assessment, none of the main geopolitical players in the Middle East – the United States, Iran, Saudi Arabia, China and Israel itself – have an interest in expanding the conflict beyond its current Gaza-centered scope. Most of the secondary players (including the EU, too disunited to be able to play a principal role) are of the same mindset, even though there are exceptions as illustrated by Yemen’s Houthi militia claiming that they fired long-range missiles at Israel. Altogether, what seems to be driving the markets is an assessment that escalatory incidents will not be allowed to spiral out of control, with a low probability of miscalculation by the key participants.

The market, of course, has been wrong before. No sane person can feel comfortable about the immense human suffering and the events that have been unfolding in the eastern Mediterranean in the past four weeks. The sequence of events that started on 7 October is still in its early days, with no shortage of scenarios in which catastrophic damage spreads well beyond Gaza and Israel. For now, the markets' baseline is that those scenarios won’t materialise.

The Why Axis is a weekly newsletter distributed by Bruegel, bringing you the latest research on European economic policy. 

About the authors

  • Nicolas Véron

    Nicolas Véron is a senior fellow at Bruegel and at the Peterson Institute for International Economics in Washington, DC. His research is mostly about financial systems and financial reform around the world, including global financial regulatory initiatives and current developments in the European Union. He was a cofounder of Bruegel starting in 2002, initially focusing on Bruegel’s design, operational start-up and development, then on policy research since 2006-07. He joined the Peterson Institute in 2009 and divides his time between the US and Europe.

    Véron has authored or co-authored numerous policy papers that include banking supervision and crisis management, financial reporting, the Eurozone policy framework, and economic nationalism. He has testified repeatedly in front of committees of the European Parliament, national parliaments in several EU member states, and US Congress. His publications also include Smoke & Mirrors, Inc.: Accounting for Capitalism, a book on accounting standards and practices (Cornell University Press, 2006), and several books in French.

    His prior experience includes working for Saint-Gobain in Berlin and Rothschilds in Paris in the early 1990s; economic aide to the Prefect in Lille (1995-97); corporate adviser to France’s Labour Minister (1997-2000); and chief financial officer of MultiMania / Lycos France, a publicly-listed online media company (2000-2002). From 2002 to 2009 he also operated an independent Paris-based financial consultancy.

    Véron is a board member of the derivatives arm (Global Trade Repository) of the Depositary Trust and Clearing Corporation (DTCC), a financial infrastructure company that operates globally on a not-for-profit basis. A French citizen born in 1971, he has a quantitative background as a graduate from Ecole Polytechnique (1992) and Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Paris (1995). He is trilingual in English, French and Spanish, and has fluent understanding of German and Italian.

    In September 2012, Bloomberg Markets included Véron in its second annual 50 Most Influential list with reference to his early advocacy of European banking union.

     

Related content